|
MMRPG discussion > EQMGNT > Human Monk VS. Iskar Monk |
|
| << Prev Topic | Next Topic >> |
| Author |
Comment
|
|||
|
seastate5
Monk Posts: 3 (6/25/01 11:04 am) Reply |
Human Monk VS. Iskar Monk I was just curiouse which race makes a better monk. I am getting ready to start a monk and needed to know. Thanks. |
|||
|
tsunan
Monk Posts: 1 (6/25/01 1:02 pm) Reply |
Re: Human Monk VS. Iskar Monk
This is debatable depending on your play style.
Human's have an easier time traveling and banking all over, while Iksar takes a lot more work to be able to do so. Iksar have the best starting zones areound, and with regen solo better. Humans have better fists post 30, but are night blind while iksars do okay at night. Humans have greater gear selections. Personally I solo quite a bit so Iksar suits me, it you group mostly, or have a group you will be workign with, then go with whichever goes best with them (good vs evil). Tsunan |
|||
|
Chiggy Monk Posts: 52 (6/27/01 1:29 am) Reply |
Re: Human Monk VS. Iskar Monk no.... god, not another motherfucking human vs iksar thread. |
|||
|
Ishogio Monk Posts: 4 (9/18/01 4:36 am) Reply |
Re: Human Monk VS. Iskar Monk I will descripe this very short and easy. 1: Humans Gains lvls fast, but cant do much else. Sure they can bank in Felwithe, but who cares when we do Velious all the time anyway. 2: Iksars These have 1)better stats, 2) better inate abilities. If you ever plan to reach lvl 50+, go for iksar all the way. They are much much much better in the end game. Who cares how long time it took to reach 60, when you are there. Iksars are So kick ass, that human monks felt "nerfed" when they made iksar monks...Thats how good they are. "If there were fewer robbers, there wouldn't be so many of them, numerically speaking." -John Cleese, "Monty Python's Flying Circus" |
|||
|
Kumagai
Monk Posts: 1 (10/11/01 4:25 pm) Reply |
Re: Human Monk VS. Iskar Monk Well, I think that the Iksar is better. Although I am a human. Iksars do have beter stats...including AC, a special iksar gift. They swim good...only bad thing is facton w/ most places. But yeah...I'm only lv. 11 but i do know lotsa stuff...so just...send me a tell on the lanys t'vyl server...if yo are on it. |
|||
|
kidkaotik
Monk Posts: 1 (11/5/01 10:43 pm) Reply |
human vs iksar i would have to say it's a tossup....each has it's own benefits.... 1) human - lvl faster, can go to most places, can wear more and better types of equiptment, and best of all, damage output is significantly higher, blind at nite 2) iksar - hp bonus, regen, 100 swimming, and awesome starting zone. oh yeah, and can see at night, restricted gear yeah, i'd say that iksar is better solo than human, but w/ good equiptment, the damage output of a human will outrank, so it's still a tossup. i don't think this post helped any, but perhaps it just clarified things a bit. all in all, choose what you like and what you're good with |
|||
|
Sikanak
Monk Posts: 8 (11/6/01 10:17 am) Reply |
Re: human vs iksar Once you have Epic, there is no damage difference between iksar and human. For that matter, once you use any weapon other than your fists theres no difference. It esentially comes down to AC/regen/vision. Iksar are better in all 3, but will it impact your game to a degree that you care? Sikanak Shadowscale |
|||
|
Darleck
Monk Posts: 1 (6/5/02 3:11 am) Reply |
Re: human vs iksar play what you like my alt monk is human cause i don't like play a lizard i didn't compare stat and damg ect Darleck the sage (except when too much drinking) Member of the guilde Keltiex |
|||
<< Prev Topic |
Next Topic >>
|
Topic Commands |
|