Then you could perhaps get a little educated about the nuclear explosion which the US Goverment carried out high up in Earths atmosphere!


I knew you'd respond with something like this. See my above posting. It's clear that you are the one who needs to get a little educated about Starfish Prime.
There was another test called Argus. Where they detonated some 1.7 kiloton warheads at high altitude ( 100 to 466 miles) and measured the resultant artificial change in radiation levels.

Operation Argus was designed to "....investigate the effects of nuclear explosions outside of the atmosphere - how the charged particles and radioactive isotopes released would interact with the Earth's magnetic field which could potentially interfere with radar tracking, communications, and the electronics of satellites and ballistic missiles."

From your article, it looks like you made a hodgepodge of these two tests.

You do realise that the method in which Bennet used to "confirm" the existence of this alleged third belt was "remote viewing", don't you?

"but since when was light selective on which objects it lit up?"

If you read carefully, the sun angle actually changed between these two photos. That's the point. The effect is confined to within very small phase angles.

"the first few minutes of the first EVA on Apollo 11 is really poor quality, foggy footage, which suddenly improves into a clear picture.

I think it might be to do with changing receiving dishes, I'll check into this.

"Its apparent to me that Boss has brought up some good arguements...."

.....That have already been debunked a thousand times. *Yawn*.

I agree that the ISS work has meant that astronauts have had to work outside with machinery and gloves.

Not just ISS astronauts. Shuttle astronauts as well. They need quite a high degree of so-called "fine motor control".

But, are they working with camera lenses or changing films in dusty surroundings?

They've definitely worked with cameras during on-orbit EVAs. I can't see how dust will hamper their hand movements. Apollo astronauts had a brush I believe to wipe their camera free of dust.

"The conditions on the Moon are completely different to those experienced whilst floating in space.."

Hmmm, let's see. They're both in vacuum. They're both subjected to similar temperatures. One's in microgravity, the other's in reduced gravity.

with a debate on BS - er BA

Well, it sure as hell wasn't on Comic Conspiracies. Er, I mean CoSmic Conspiracies.

BTW... Has that guy on BA managed to find Area 51 yet? enough said!

And say, did you ever hear about those people who claim that the Apollo programme was fake (or at least the "record")? 'Nuff Said!

Shuttle astronauts and ISS astronauts are both working in vacuum. If they were in an atmosphere they wouldn't maintain their orbit.

Yes, satellites do decay due to "atmospheric drag", but it's insignificant unless over large periods of time. It is a cummulative effect and takes many years to cause a satellite to decay. There is the odd air molecule up there, but it is effectively vacuum.

Is that hit count since Comic Conspiracies' inception? That doesn't automatically translate into a lot of people reading this forum.