One in evolution we started as single cell organism, who reproduce asexually, why then was there a need to reproduce through the exchanging of genes? It takes more energy, and energy is one thing that the first organisms (if you follow evolution) could afford to waste. Where did this abundance of food come from in the beginning? Where they carnivorous? A book you should look into reading that was made by a rocket scientist who was an atheist who was looking to prove God did not exist, but then became a Christian after doing his research. Answer me one question if you can, what was the last recorded species to go through evolution, and I will define evolution for you, it is the change in the genetic make-up of a population over a period of time, hence the population means in a centralized group, which means it is pretty specific, so please give me the last species that was recorded to go through evolution?

"The principle runs through all life from top to bottom. Give up yourself, and you will find your real self. Lose your life and you will save it. Submit to death, death of your ambitions and favorite wishes everyday and death of your whole body in the end: submit with every fiber of your being, and you will find enternal life. Keep back nothing. Nothing that you have not given away will ever really be yours. Nothing in you that has not died will ever be raised from the dead. Look for yourself, and you will find in the long run only hatred, loneliness, despair, rage, ruin, and decay. But look for Christ and you will find Him, and with Him everything else thrown in." -C.S. Lewis "Mere Christianity"

Mrhano

"Concerning the "g" reference, he means that since you don't believe in the one true God, that you should use the lowercase god instead. It's not a grammar thing."

Just trying not to offend.
"Now, since we are talking about fossils, can we mention that scientists have recently found a human skeleton that is older than the "pre-human" skeletons? By pre-human, I mean the so-called bones that stepping-stones leading from ape to human."

Your point is? There are always facts to be uncovered. Think of it this way: Instead of finding the wedding cake ready made they found the batter instead.

"Also concerning fossils... If you look at other creatures other than human-shaped creatures, you do not see bones bridging the gaps from one species to another or from fish to mammal."

I don't think you read the posts and references on transitional fossils. I am not going to repost on that. The evidence is overwhelming and the majority of respected scientists accept the theory as fact. Notice I use the word accept and not beleive. I also use the word "respected" in relation to scientists. Creation scientists don't present any evidence that is credible. That is why they don't offer any work that cab be published in any recognized scientific journal nor offered for review in any recognized scientific community. Your answer will be because science is committed to the evolution theory. My response is that science will point to the evidence at hand . The bottom line comes down to your belief or disbelief vs. the evidence and what we have experienced and observed. This is real. No one has seen God, God has not spoken to anyone, God has not let himself be known to God, there are no experiments or phenomenon that would let one suspect that their is a God.